Monday, 7 December 2015

CLO 5

LSC 2533 Research Methods
Journal Article Reviews (CLO 5)


Components
Three articles are described with the following for sections each:
·         Section 1 – Library research description
·         Section 2 – Article abstracts and references
·         Section 3 – Research descriptions
·         Section 4 – Article evaluation

The full evaluation is provided under the top ranked article – Article 1  














Article 1

Section 1
Source:           HCT Libraries page >Discover>Electronic Resources   
Search terms: Divorce and children

Section 2

Title: DIVORCE IS A PART OF MY LIFE... RESILIENCE, SURVIVAL, AND VULNERABILITY: YOUNG ADULTS' PERCEPTION OF THE IMPLICATIONS OF PARENTAL DIVORCE

Abstract
A qualitative study among 22 young adults (20-25 years old) whose parents divorced during their childhood was conducted in Israel, using semi-structured, in-depth, open-ended interviews. Qualitative data analysis led to identification of three profiles, aiming at a grounded theoretical conceptualization. Three core themes were identified: the centrality of the family; short- and long-term implications of parental divorce and its relations to supportive coping resources; and perspective at young adulthood. Further analysis led to typifying participants by three profiles, which represent the grounded theoretical conceptualizations: resilience, survival, and vulnerability. The most prominent difference among the profiles was the relationships between participants and their parents, and their perception of ongoing parental responsibility. A thorough discussion of the results and their implications for future research, theory development, and practice are presented. (Eldar-Avidan, Haj-Yahia, & Greenbaum, 2009)

Reference
Eldar-Avidan, D., Haj-Yahia, M. M., & Greenbaum, C. W. (2009). DIVORCE IS A PART OF MY LIFE... RESILIENCE, SURVIVAL, AND VULNERABILITY: YOUNG ADULTS' PERCEPTION OF THE IMPLICATIONS OF PARENTAL DIVORCE. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30-46.

Section 3

Population
The article describes population of Israeli young adults whose parents divorced before these young adults were 18 years old.
Research Approach
The article is qualitative in nature which leads to descriptive results and is followed by a grounded-theory approach to data analysis. It takes subjective perceptions and experiences of young Israeli adults about their parents’ divorce through in-depth, open-ended, semi-structured interviews.
Participant selection
Purposive, theoretical and spiral sampling was used in the selection of the participants. Of the 22 participants of six were men and 16 were women. Those were Israeli, and single. Their parents were married before 3-20 years. At the time of their parents, the age of the participants were 2-17. Parents were divorced 6-22 years before the participants’ interviews.

Main results
Through the data analysis of the respondents, three central themes were identified: centrality of family, short and long-term effects of divorce on the young adults and their handling, and their perceptions about divorce. From that analysis, three profiles the major findings of the research and these offer a grounded theory with explaining theoretical understanding of resilience, survival and vulnerability in the perspective of parental divorce. These profiles shows the participants’ perception of themselves, their functioning and ability to deal with the developmental tasks of adulthood with regards to parental divorce.  These profiles are connected to the ability of parents to act responsibly to support their children cope with the situations of life.

The resilience were flexible and valued the family relations greatly. They were optimistic and interpreted the divorce as empowering and meaningful. While knowing the associated pain in the divorce their overall perception is of gain. In this study 9 out of 22 fell in this category. 8 out of 22 participants were survivors who saw divorce as complex and which require lot of adjustments. They are unsure about their experiences and know about the vulnerability of gains but also the losses. They had a sense of mutual responsibility. The participants with this type of profile had very painful memories about divorce which were effecting their lives very negatively. In the present study, five participants out of 22 were vulnerable.



Section 4
            Ranking: Best
The study has a broad and well defined approach in terms of its model to deal with the subject in a broader and long term perspective. It has covered very significant traits of human behavior with association to the human social conditions. I have gained useful exposure and insights about the different themes studied and analyzed through this research. The authors had found three different personality traits with regards to effects of divorce. The first one being the resilience who were flexible and valued the family relations greatly. They were optimistic and interpreted the divorce as empowering and meaningful. While knowing the associated pain in the divorce their overall perception is of gain.  The second one was of survivors who saw divorce as complex and which require lot of adjustments. They are unsure about their experiences and know about the vulnerability of gains but also the losses. They had a sense of mutual responsibility. The last personality is called as vulnerable who had very painful memories about divorce which were effecting their lives very negatively. The major implication for practice should involve mental health professionals and family therapists which could offer proactive and reactive help in different stage of children adjustment.
The validity of the article could be increased if there were more number of participants included in the research with consideration of diverse backgrounds.







































Article 2

Section 1
Source:           HCT Libraries page >Discover>Electronic Resources   
Search terms: Divorce

Section 2

Title: The Long Reach of Divorce: Divorce and Child Well-Being Across Three Generations

Abstract
We used data from the study of Marital Instability Over the Life Course to examine links between divorce in the grandparent generation and outcomes in the grandchild generation (N = 691). Divorce in the first (G1) generation was associated with lower education, more marital discord, weaker ties with mothers, and weaker ties with fathers in the third (G3) generation. These associations were mediated by family characteristics in the middle (G2) generation, including lower education, more marital discord, more divorce, and greater tension in early parent-child relationships. In supplementary analyses, we found no evidence that the estimated effects of divorce differed by offspring gender or became weaker over time. Our results suggest that divorce has consequences for subsequent generations, including individuals who were not yet born at the time of the original divorce.

Reference
Amato, P. R., & Cheadle, J. (2005). The long reach of divorce: Divorce and child well‐being across three generations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(1), 191-206.
Section 3

Population
The population of this study consisted of all married individuals in a household in the neighboring United States who has a telephone, both husband and wife present and both spouses were 55 years of age or less in the year 1890. The study was conducted from years 1980 to 2000. The study was conducted in and around the United States.

Research Approach
The present article is of a qualitative nature which takes interview as a method of data collection and insights.

Participant selection
Random digit dialing technique was used to select a household sample and another second random procedure was used to select husband and wife of the research participants. The final sample size was 2033 married persons (not couples).

Main results
The authors concluded that there was a consistent trend with the implications of grandparents (Generation 1) divorce on the grand children (Generation 3). G1 divorce was associated negatively with G3 education and positively linked with G3 marital conflict. It was also negatively associated with quality of G3 relations with fathers and mothers. Overall results say that divorce in the grandparent generation was associated with numerous problematic consequences in the generation of grandchild. Hence according to the result of the study, those grandchildren whose grandparents had divorced obtained less education, earned less income have more trouble in marriages, and have weak relationship with their parents and face several psychological problems. 

Section 4
            Ranking: Bottom










Article 3

Section 1
Source:           HCT Libraries page >Discover>Electronic Resources
Search terms: Divorce

Section 2

Title: The Cause of Divorce among Men and Women Referred to Marriage and Legal Office in Qazvin, Iran

Abstract
Marital separation and divorce can be the most unpleasant event in the adult's life, and families will be hurt by divorce event. The prevalence of divorce has been increased in last decades. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify the divorce cause among the divorce seeking men and women in Qazvin, Iran. This cross-sectional study was conducted among 572 (400 women and 172 men) subjects who requested for divorce and were referred to divorce and marriage office of Qazvin province during 3 month in 2009. Data were collected by self - administered questionnaire, interviewing subjects and using Likert scale. Data were analyzed by Chi- Square test and Mann-Whitney (SPSS version 16). The participants of the study included 400 women (26.5±7.4 years) and 172 men. In view points of women the primary wrong mate selection was main cause of divorce (59.8%), but the men believed that the families and relatives interference was the main reason for separation (43.7%). Among the respondents, mean score of "dependency to their families" and "unmet emotional needs" were 3.44±1.6 and 3.86±1.4 respectively. In addition mean score of infertility among men and women were 1.37±1.0 and 1.29±0.9 respectively. Wrong mate selection, unmet emotional needs, families' interference, and "dependency to families" are more important factors than traditional factors which are sexual or physical factors.

Reference
Barikani, A., Ebrahim, S. M., & Navid, M. (2012). The cause of divorce among men and women referred to marriage and legal office in Qazvin, Iran. Global journal of health science, 4(5), p184.
Section 3
Population
The population used in the research were women and men with a total of 572. Among them 400 were women and 172 were men who had requested for divorce in the office of marriage and divorce in year 2009. The study was conducted in the Qazvin province of Iran.


Research Approach
The research approach was quantitative which involved self-administered questionnaires. The Likert scale was administered in the study and the outcomes are presented numerically.

Participant selection
The selection of the sample is not clear in the study, however it is mention in the method that those who had requested for divorce during 3 months, from August to November were included in the research.
 
            Main results  
The results indicate that according to women participants, 60% viewed the major cause for divorce was “primary wrong selection”. Among men, 43.7% believed that the main cause of the divorce is effect of “family interference”. The average score form both men and women viewed "dependency to his or her family" and "unmet emotional needs" (feeling less) were higher than any other factors causing divorce. The "infertility" as a factor of divorce in both women’s and men’s opinion were lower than the other factors. However, table 5 suggests that "dependency to his or her family" and "Primary wrong selection of spouse" were the most significant reasons for divorce from the men and women perspective respectively. 


Section 4
            Ranking: Middle